Search by property

From CODECS: Online Database and e-Resources for Celtic Studies

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Has description" with value "Second part of the story relating to the Síd of Ess Rúaid, in which Caílte rids the <em>síd</em> of a destructive bird, ed. [[SMW::off]]Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1900a|Acallamh na senórach]]’ in <i>Irische Texte mit Wörterbuch...</i> (1900)[[SMW::on]]: line 1622ff, beg. <em>As annsin táinicc Derg Dianscothach roime isin sídh anunn d’urfhuigeall Cháilti re h-Ilbreac Easa Ruaid</em>; tr. [[SMW::off]]Ann <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Dooley</span> • Harry <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Roe</span>, <i>[[Dooley and Roe 1999|Tales of the elders of Ireland]]</i> (1999)[[SMW::on]]: 50–55. Derg Díanscothach goes to Ilbrecc (of Assaroe) and Áed Mínbrecc in the <em>síd</em>, tells of Caílte, arranges for them a meeting. Caílte is allowed in and learns of the war between Ilbrecc and Lir of the Síd of Finnachad. Caílte brings down a destructive bird [and later recounts the tale of Finn and Aillén].". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 51 results starting with #1.

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • Dúan in cethrachat cest - §§ 1–3, concerning Fénius Farsaid  + (§§ 1-3, series of questions and answers co§§ 1-3, series of questions and answers concerning Fénius Farsaid, his wife Bélait and her lover Iar mac Néma; ed. and tr. Rudolf <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Thurneysen</span>, ‘[[Thurneysen 1921b|Das Gedicht der vierzig Fragen von Eochaid ua Cérín]]’, <i>Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie</i> 13 (1921); discussed by Bart <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Jaski</span>, ‘[[Jaski 2006a|Aeneas and Fénius: a classical case of mistaken identity]]’ in <i>Texts and identities in the early Middle Ages...</i> (2006): 29–31.ntities in the early Middle Ages...</i> (2006): 29–31.)
  • Trecheng breth Féne - §§ 1-31. Monastic sites in Ireland  + (§§ 1-31 as they stand in Kuno <span cla§§ 1-31 as they stand in Kuno <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Meyer</span>, <i>[[Meyer 1906c|The Triads of Ireland]]</i> (1906). This part, which does not offer any triads, gives a list of 31 monastic sites in Ireland and describes them in terms of a particular attribute or quality, e.g. Armagh as the head of Ireland or Emly as the <em>senchas</em> of Ireland. Fergus <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Kelly</span>, ‘[[Kelly 2004a|Thinking in threes]]’, <i>Proceedings of the British Academy</i> 125 (2004): 3 points out that the inclusion of Kells, which was founded in 809, gives us a terminus post quem for the composition of the text, or at least this part of the text.inus post quem for the composition of the text, or at least this part of the text.)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 121–126  + (§§ 121–126, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 121–126, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): first part of the narrative describing the battle of Mag Tuired. Eager to know why their opponents excel in the quality of weapons and treatment of the wounded, the Fomoire send a spy, who does not, however, survive his mission. Discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 127–138  + (§§ 127–138, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 127–138, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): second part of the narrative describing the battle of Mag Tuired; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 139–148  + (§§ 139–148, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 139–148, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): how after the battle of Mag Tuired, Lóch Lethglas is spared and offers Lug detailed reports of the battle and its outcome; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).e Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 14 and 24  + (§§ 14 and 24, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <§§ 14 and 24, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the accesssion of Bres; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983), Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 18 (1981) and Gerard <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Murphy</span>, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955).n ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 149–161  + (§§ 149–161, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 149–161, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also, Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): how after the battle of Mag Tuired, the defeated king Bres is spared and Lug arranges a deal with him; discussed in William <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Sayers</span>, ‘[[Sayers 1986a|Bargaining for the life of Bres in <i>Cath Maige Tuired</i>]]’, <i>Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies</i> 34 (1987), John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).uired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 15–23  + (§§ 15–23, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 15–23, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the conception and birth of Bres; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983), Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 18 (1981) and Gerard <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Murphy</span>, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955).''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 162–165  + (§§ 162–165, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 162–165, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): three miscellaneous anecdotes after the account of the battle of Mag Tuired; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 166–167  + (§§ 166–167, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s§§ 166–167, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): conclusion in which the Morrígan utters two ''roscada''; discussed by John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).e Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Aided Cheltchair maic Uthechair - §§ 1–6  + (§§ 1–6, describing how Celtchar went into exile. Ed. Kuno <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Meyer</span>, <i>[[Meyer 1906d|The death-tales of the Ulster heroes]]</i> (1906).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 1–7  + (§§ 1–7, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span §§ 1–7, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the origins of the Tuatha Dé (from Harleian 5280, f. 63r ff); discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982). Regarded as a later addition to the text, e.g. in Gerard <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Murphy</span>, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955). A longer version of this introduction is found as a separate text, edited in Vernam <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Hull</span>, ‘[[Hull 1930d|The four jewels of the ''Tuatha Dé Danann'']]’, <i>Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie</i> 18 (1930), and a recension of the <em>Lebor gabála</em> also includes a version.''Tuatha Dé Danann'']]’, <i>Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie</i> 18 (1930), and a recension of the <em>Lebor gabála</em> also includes a version.)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 25–32  + (§§ 25–32, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 25–32, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the reign of Bres: tribute and the story of the Dagda, Mac Óc and the satirist Cridenbél; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982). Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 33–35  + (§§ 33–35, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 33–35, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): during Bres’s reign, the story of Núadu, Dían Cecht and the killing of the latter’s son Míach; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).ed'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 36–40  + (§§ 36–40, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 36–40, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the reign of Bres (continued), marks of bad kingship and the decision to depose Bres after seven years of rule; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Mucrama - §§ 39–43. Conception of Fiachu Muillethan  + (§§ 39–43. The night before the battle of M§§ 39–43. The night before the battle of Mag Mucrama (part 1: the conception of Fiachu Muillethan), ed. and tr. Máirín <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Daly</span>, <i>[[O'Daly 1975|Cath Maige Mucrama: The battle of Mag Mucrama]]</i> (1975). Mirror story of §§ 44–47, on Cormac’s birth and conception.irror story of §§ 44–47, on Cormac’s birth and conception.)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 41–51  + (§§ 41–51, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 41–51, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): how Bres, following the decision to oust him from the kingship after seven years, seeks the Fomoire, meets his father and requests military support to regain the kingship of Ireland; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Mucrama - §§ 44–47. Conception of Cormac mac Airt  + (§§ 44–47. The night before the battle of M§§ 44–47. The night before the battle of Mag Mucrama (part 2: the conception of Cormac mac Airt), ed. and tr. Máirín <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Daly</span>, <i>[[O'Daly 1975|Cath Maige Mucrama: The battle of Mag Mucrama]]</i> (1975). Mirror story of §§ 39–43, on Fíachu’s birth and conception.irror story of §§ 39–43, on Fíachu’s birth and conception.)
  • Cath Maige Mucrama - §§ 5–9. Fer Fí’s revenge and the cause of the conflict  + (§§ 5-9, on Fer Fí's revenge and the cause of the conflict, ed. and tr. Máirín <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Daly</span>, <i>[[O'Daly 1975|Cath Maige Mucrama: The battle of Mag Mucrama]]</i> (1975).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 52–74  + (§§ 52–74, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 52–74, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the arrival of Lug (Samildánach) at Tara and his attainment of the leadership over the Túatha Dé; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Críth gablach - §§ 6–8  + (§§ 6-8 (on the <em>fer midboth</e§§ 6-8 (on the <em>fer midboth</em>), ed. D. A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Binchy</span>, <i>[[Binchy 1941|Críth gablach]]</i> (1941); discussed by Neil <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">McLeod</span>, ‘[[McLeod 1982a|The two <em>fer midboth</em> and their evidence in court]]’, <i>Ériu</i> 33 (1982).eod 1982a|The two <em>fer midboth</em> and their evidence in court]]’, <i>Ériu</i> 33 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Mucrama - §§ 67–75. Mac Con’s death  + (§§ 67–75. The death of Mac Con, ed. and tr. Máirín <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Daly</span>, <i>[[O'Daly 1975|Cath Maige Mucrama: The battle of Mag Mucrama]]</i> (1975).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 75–83  + (§§ 75–83, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 75–83, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the secret council convened by the Túatha Dé in preparation for the battle against the Fomoire; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982). Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 84–93  + (§§ 84–93, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa§§ 84–93, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on two of the Dagda’s missions concerning the battle of Mag Tuired, both of which involve him sleeping with a female deity; discussed in Patrick K. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ford</span>, ‘[[Ford (Patrick K.) 1998a|The <i>which</i> on the wall: obscenity exposed in early Ireland]]’ in <i>Obscenity...</i> (1998), John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983), Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).: myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 94–120  + (§§ 94–120, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <sp§§ 94–120, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): some events and conversations shortly before the battle of Mag Tuired, especially concerning the special skills and abilities of the Túatha Dé [prelude to §§ 121–126]; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983), Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1982) and Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).: myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 19 (1983).)
  • Mittelirische Verslehren II - §§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112 (10th year)  + (§§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112, ed. Rudolf <s§§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112, ed. Rudolf <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Thurneysen</span>, ‘[[Thurneysen 1891|Mittelirische Verslehren]]’ in <i>Irische Texte mit Wörterbuch...</i> (1891): 54–59 <i class="fa fa-chevron-right " ></i> <small>[https://archive.org/stream/irischetextemite00stok#page/54/mode/2up direct link]</small>. The first series of items (§§ 99-109) lists and illustrates the metrical forms to be mastered by an aspirant <em>fili</em> in his tenth year of study (<em>foglaim</em>). The forms representing this stage of education, perhaps known collectively as <em>set-natha/sed-nadha súad</em> (§ 112; cf. <em>sen-natha</em>, § 99) are thought to have been inserted into the original text when it was first expanded (Thurneysen). It continues with a further section (§§ 110-112), which may represent a later addition to the text.Thurneysen). It continues with a further section (§§ 110-112), which may represent a later addition to the text.)
  • Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 9–13  + (§§ 9–13, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span§§ 9–13, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, <i>[[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]]</i> (1982) and also Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, <i>Revue Celtique</i> 12 (1891): on the taking of Ireland from the Fir Bolg; discussed in John <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carey</span>, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in <em>Cath Maige Tuired</em>]]’, <i>Studia Celtica</i> 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cathasaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in <i>Folia Gadelica...</i> (1983), Elizabeth A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gray</span>, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 18 (1981) and Gerard <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Murphy</span>, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955). Like §§ 1–7, this section is often regarded as an interpolation based on <em>Lebor gabála Érenn</em> (see e.g. Gerard <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Murphy</span>, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955)).Tuired'']]’, <i>Éigse</i> 7 (1953–1955)).)
  • Agents for index: Acallam na senórach: A  + (Áed Essa Ruaid see Áed Minbrecc.)
  • Agents for index: Acallam na senórach: A  + (Áed Essa Rúaid 1561. 5126. 6901. see Dinds. 91.)
  • Agents for index: Acallam na senórach: A  + (Áed Mínbrecc m. in Dagda 1623. 1649. 1783. 6803.)
  • Áine ingen Moduirn  + (Áine ingen Moduirn (var. <em>Mugduirn</em>), daughter of Modarn, king of Scotland, in the <em>Acallam na senórach</em>)
  • Aid:McManus index to bardic poems  + (Ó Cuív, Brian: ‘Some items relating to the MacDonnells of Antrim’, Celtica 16, 139-56: 150-2)
  • Saltair Óg  + (Ó Riain suggests that the <i>SaltairÓ Riain suggests that the <i>Saltair Óg</i> was probably known to John Colgan and that his description of the actual Psalter of Cashel was in part based on it. What happened to Ó Clérigh’s copy is unknown but after John Colgan died in 1658, it was not among Ó Cléirigh’s books known to have been found in Colgan’s cell.igh’s books known to have been found in Colgan’s cell.)
  • Aid:PONK/2004  + (Über die Identität von Nár Túathcháech ausÜber die Identität von Nár Túathcháech aus der verlorengegangenen Erzählung ''Echtrae Chrimthainn Nia Náir''.<br/></br>In: Erich Poppe (red.), ''Keltologie heute. Themen und Fragestellungen. Akten des 3. Deutschen Keltologensymposiums-Marburg, März 2001'', Studien und Texte zur Keltologie 6 (Münster: Nodus, 2004) 169-193.zur Keltologie 6 (Münster: Nodus, 2004) 169-193.)
  • Contra insulsam vulgi opinionem de grandine et tonitruis (Agobard of Lyons) - sections  + (‘Against the irrational opinion of the peo‘Against the irrational opinion of the people about hail and thunder’, treatise by Agobard (d. 840), bishop of Lyons, ed. L. van Acker, <em>Agobardi Lugdunensis opera omnia</em>, CCCM 52, Turnhout: Brepols, 1981. 3-15 (cf. Patrologia Latina CIV). Agobard criticises local belief in the effectiveness of <em>tempestarii</em> (sorcerers in control of storms and similar weather phenomena that are harmful to agriculture), offering ample biblical passages to refute and correct it. Some discussion is to be found in Rob <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Meens</span>, ‘[[Meens (Rob) 2012b|Thunder over Lyon: Agobard, the <em>tempestarii</em> and Christianity]]’ in <i>Paganism in the Middle Ages...</i> (2012) and see the references provided there.>Paganism in the Middle Ages...</i> (2012) and see the references provided there.)
  • Aid:PONK/2003  + (‘Armagh, Book of’, ‘Durrow, Book of’, ‘glosses’.<br/> In: Brian Lalor (red.), ''The encyclopaedia of Ireland'' (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 2003) 45, 330, 444-445.)
  • Aid:PONK/2005  + (‘Brian Boru’, ‘kings and kingship’, ‘Máel-Sechnaill I’, ‘Máel-Sechnaill II’.<br/> In: Seán Duffy (red.), ''Medieval Ireland: an encyclopedia'' (New York: Routledge, 2005) 45-47, 251-254, 309-310, 310-312.)
  • Aid:PONK/2005  + (‘Burgh’, ‘Connacht’, ‘Ua Conchobair (Uí Conchobair, Ó Conchobair)’.<br/> In: Seán Duffy (red.), ''Medieval Ireland: an encyclopedia'' (New York: Routledge, 2005) 55-58, 103-4, 464-466.)
  • Solusbrethach  + (‘Light of Judgment’, one of the angels in the <i>Acallam na senórach</i> (the other being Aibelán ‘Little Flame’) who instruct Patrick on the virtues of listening to and recording Fenian tales, relieving him of some of his religious scruples.)
  • Aibelán  + (‘Little Flame’; in the <i>Acallam na senórach</i>, one of the angels (the other being Solusbrethach ‘Light of Judgment’) who instruct Patrick on the virtues of listening to and recording Fenian tales, relieving him of some of his religious scruples.)
  • Acallam na senórach - ll. 1–57. Prologue  + (‘Prologue’ to the <em>Acallam na sen‘Prologue’ to the <em>Acallam na senórach</em>, ed. Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1900a|Acallamh na senórach]]’ in <i>Irische Texte mit Wörterbuch...</i> (1900): lines 1–57, cf. Myles <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Dillon</span>, <i>[[Dillon 1970a|Stories from the Acallam]]</i> (1970); tr. Dooley and Roe (1999): 3-4.</br></br>Following a series of battles, the ''Fían'', i.e. the <em>fían</em> of Finn mac Cumaill, has been destroyed and its few remaining survivors are dispersed across Ireland. A small remnant from this bygone age survives into the time of St Patrick’s advent in Ireland: aged, weakened and sorrowful, Finn’s son Oisín and Finn’s nephew Caílte still wander about, each with a band of followers. One day, having travelled to the area of Louth, they seek hospitality for the night and find a welcome and lavish reception in the home of Lady Cáma, who used to be Finn’s guardian. Oisín and Caílte part ways. While Oisín goes to visit his mother Blaí at Síd Ochta Cleitig (a <em>síd</em>-mound), Caílte journeys southwards to Ráith Droma Deirc (Ford of the Red Ridge), the site of Finn’s residence.</br></br>Following Dooley and Roe (1999), this section of the <em>Acallam</em> may be treated as a prologue in that it occurs before Caílte’s (first) meeting with St Patrick.m</em> may be treated as a prologue in that it occurs before Caílte’s (first) meeting with St Patrick.)
  • Aid:PONK/2003  + (‘aonach’, ‘divorce, medieval’, ‘high-kings‘aonach’, ‘divorce, medieval’, ‘high-kingship’, ‘kingship’, ‘marriage, early Irish’, ‘Niall of the Nine Hostages’, ‘tánaiste’, ‘Tara, kingship of’, ‘Vikings’, ‘women, status of, 800-1200’.<br/></br>In: Brian Lalor (red.), ''The encyclopaedia of Ireland'' (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 2003) 36, 302, 492, 594-595, 697, 782, 1033, 1035-1036, 1111, 1145.492, 594-595, 697, 782, 1033, 1035-1036, 1111, 1145.)
  • rannaigecht gairit  + (‘shortened’ (''gairit'') ''rannaigecht'' metres. A variation on <em>rannaigecht dialtach</em> or <em>rannaigecht recomarcach</em>, in which the first line is abbreviated to three syllables.)
  • Llên Cymru  + (“Founded in 1950 as a Welsh-language journ“Founded in 1950 as a Welsh-language journal, <em>Llên Cymru</em>’s editorial purpose is to publish the highest quality academic research on Welsh literature of any period, and welcomes research in the form of both scholarly and opinion-based articles. Having edited the journal from volume 20 to volume 35, Professor Gruffydd Aled Williams transferred editorship in 2013 to Dr Dylan Foster Evans, Dr E. Wyn James and Dr Siwan Rosser, all of the School of Welsh at Cardiff University. The journal, published annually, includes full-length articles, a notes section for short contributions, and book reviews. Typically, articles can incorporate research on early Welsh poetry, twentieth-century Welsh literature and traditional Welsh folk tales” (source: UWP).ature and traditional Welsh folk tales” (source: UWP).)
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 514  + (“Later owners named are Mac Suibhne of Bag“Later owners named are Mac Suibhne of Baghaine (f. iiir of Part I), and ‘Donnogh mc Swyn’ and ‘Henry Swyne’ (f. [19]r of Part II).”<span id="ref2" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(2)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 2</sup> Brian <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Cuív</span>, <i>[[Ó Cuív 2001|Catalogue of Irish MSS in the Bodleian]]</i> (2001): 262.</span></span> The evidence seems to point to some connection with the Clann Suibhne, particular that of Tír Boghaine (bar. Banagh, Co Donegal).oint to some connection with the Clann Suibhne, particular that of Tír Boghaine (bar. Banagh, Co Donegal).)
  • Res Celticae: UAM Journal of Celtic Studies  + (“The new, peer-reviewed journal Res Celtic“The new, peer-reviewed journal Res Celticae is published under the auspices of Adam Mickiewicz University, where Celtic Studies was newly established as a BA and MA scheme by professor Sabine Asmus (formerly Heinz) in 2004. ''Res Celticae'', first and foremost, aims to reflect contemporary research on matters Celtic in Poland, in particular at Adam-Mickiewicz-University, Poznań, but also hopes to bring together researchers of various theoretical backgrounds with an interest in Celtic studies, both from Poland and abroad. The publication of the journal seems all the more substantiated given the wide range of academic activities performed in Polish universities in this area of research as exemplified by regular conferences taking place in Poznań, Lublin, and Łódź as well as the evidence provided by new archeological sites, e.g. Kalisz. While stressing an interdisciplinary approach, the journal accepts contributions relating to three major thematic areas, i.e. Celtic linguistics, literature, history and culture, to be submitted in any of the Celtic languages or English. In order to promote Polish as a language of science a short summary of each article is given in this language. Moreover, a separate section of the journal is devoted to reviews. The journal is published annually.</br>” (source: UAM)is published annually. ” (source: UAM))
  • Saint-Omer, Bibliothèque municipale, MS 342 bis/fol. B  + (“Written in Ireland or Wales” (Lowe 1953);“Written in Ireland or Wales” (Lowe 1953); written in “keltische - irische oder britische - Schrift” (Bischoff); Brown (1982) cites it as an example of a hybrid Irish script reminiscent of MSS from Northumbria and Echternach; Parkes (1992): “Copied in Ireland s.vii <i>ex</i>”; Ganz (2015): “no doubt copied in Ireland”. While earlier commentators have expressed uncertainty about the language of the glosses,<span id="ref3" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(3)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 3</sup> Bischoff: “Einige keltische Glossen sind noch auf den Sprachcharakter ob irisch oder britisch, zu prüfen” </span></span> scholars such as Ó Cróinín (2001) have identified them as Old Irish;<span id="ref4" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(4)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 4</sup> “The language [...] makes clear that the glosses are Old Irish; the horizontal dashes, that they are early”. </span></span> he suggests that they “would all pass comfortably in the seventh century; <i>lóg</i>, for example, shows the undiphthongised form of the word that is later spelt <i>lúag / lúach</i>”.ts that they “would all pass comfortably in the seventh century; <i>lóg</i>, for example, shows the undiphthongised form of the word that is later spelt <i>lúag / lúach</i>”.)
  • Cambridge, Harvard University, Houghton Library, MS Typ 620  + (“Written presumably in Ireland” (Bischoff and Brown 1985).)
  • Dubthach (Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 23 N 10)  + (“signs his name on p. 101 m., stating that“signs his name on p. 101 m., stating that he is finishing his part of the scribal work at <em>Baile Tibhaird ar Bla Maige</em> in the company of Sean Ó Maoilchonaire on the first Monday after the Feast of Saint John 1575 (p. 101 m.). Aedh, who resumes the transcription at this point, adds to Dubthach’s colophon a word of thanks” (RIA cat. descr.).bthach’s colophon a word of thanks” (RIA cat. descr.).)
  • Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, MS lat. qu. 690/III  + (“vermutlich Mainz” (Fingernagel).<span “vermutlich Mainz” (Fingernagel).<span id="ref5" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(5)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 5</sup> Andreas <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Fingernagel</span>, <i>[[Fingernagel (Andreas) 1991a|Die illuminierten lateinischen Handschriften deutscher Provenienz der Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin: 8.-12.Jahrhundert]]</i> (1991): 88.</span></span>. Bischoff suggests that the dominant hands are of Mainz, while two are Insular or Anglo-Saxon and others point to the area of Reims and Saint-Armand.<span id="ref6" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(6)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 6</sup> “unter diesen dominieren die Mainzer, andere weisen etwa auf die Gegend von Reims oder Saint-Armand, zwei schreiben insular, wohl angelsächsisch.” Cf. his ''Katalog''. </span></span> The explanation he offers is that a likely scriptorium for such a mix of scripts to come together would be Mainz. Bischoff also suggests a connection to the Irish scholar Probus.<span id="ref7" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(7)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 7</sup> ''Katalog'': “Warscheinlich im Mainz zusammengeschrieben (vermutlich im Kreise des Iren Probus, gest. 859)” </span></span>text-spaced">(7)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 7</sup> ''Katalog'': “Warscheinlich im Mainz zusammengeschrieben (vermutlich im Kreise des Iren Probus, gest. 859)” </span></span>)
  • Acallam na senórach - ll. 1622–1653. Síd of Ess Rúaid, part 2  + (Second part of the story relating to the SSecond part of the story relating to the Síd of Ess Rúaid, in which Caílte rids the <em>síd</em> of a destructive bird, ed. [[SMW::off]]Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, ‘[[Stokes 1900a|Acallamh na senórach]]’ in <i>Irische Texte mit Wörterbuch...</i> (1900)[[SMW::on]]: line 1622ff, beg. <em>As annsin táinicc Derg Dianscothach roime isin sídh anunn d’urfhuigeall Cháilti re h-Ilbreac Easa Ruaid</em>; tr. [[SMW::off]]Ann <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Dooley</span> • Harry <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Roe</span>, <i>[[Dooley and Roe 1999|Tales of the elders of Ireland]]</i> (1999)[[SMW::on]]: 50–55. </br></br>Derg Díanscothach goes to Ilbrecc (of Assaroe) and Áed Mínbrecc in the <em>síd</em>, tells of Caílte, arranges for them a meeting. Caílte is allowed in and learns of the war between Ilbrecc and Lir of the Síd of Finnachad. Caílte brings down a destructive bird [and later recounts the tale of Finn and Aillén].nnachad. Caílte brings down a destructive bird [and later recounts the tale of Finn and Aillén].)
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (<em>Comrac Con Culaind fri Findabair</em> ‘The meeting of Cú Chulainn and Finnabair’ (I))
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (<em>In scél iar n-urd</em> ‘The story in due order’)
  • Aid:Version alignment/Tochmarc Emire  + ([V] § 26. Emer tells of her upbringing)
  • Aid:Version table/Beatha Colaim Chille/021  + (§ 31. St Patrick by Ess Rúaid)
  • Aid:Version table/Beatha Colaim Chille/021  + (§ 32. The story of St Patrick and the mill)
  • Aid:Version table/Beatha Colaim Chille/021  + (§ 37. Do Beóc of Lough Derg and St Patrick’s Purgatory)
  • Aid:Version table/Beatha Colaim Chille/021  + (§ 42. Prophecies by druids and by Finn mac Cumaill)
  • Aid:Version table/Beatha Colaim Chille/021  + (§ 50. The birth of Colum Cille (The story of Fergna, according to Mura))
  • Protestant Reformation  + ("Refers to the period of the religious rev"Refers to the period of the religious revolution that took place in the Christian church of central and northwestern Europe in the 16th century, having as its object the reform of the doctrines and practices of the Roman Catholic Church, and which became the basis for Protestantism. Its style is dictated by a shift in patronage from the church to the laity, and in subject matter from the lives of saints and other Catholic themes to ones relating more directly to the common man, particularly landscapes, still lifes, portraits, Hebrew Biblical and certain Christian Biblical themes" (AAT). certain Christian Biblical themes" (AAT).)
  • Aid:Version alignment/Tochmarc Emire  + ('''Hl'''. ff. 27r–35rb, ed. Kuno <span'''Hl'''. ff. 27r–35rb, ed. Kuno <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Meyer</span>, ‘[[Meyer 1901c5|Mitteilungen aus irischen Handschriften: IV. Aus Harleian 5280. Tochmarc Emire la Coinculaind]]’, <i>Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie</i> 3 (1901). Complete.ift für celtische Philologie</i> 3 (1901). Complete.)
  • Aid:Version alignment/Tochmarc Emire  + ('''Stowe'''. ff. 74ra–78vb, ed. A. G. van <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Hamel</span>, <i>[[Hamel 1933|Compert Con Culainn and other stories]]</i> (1933). Complete.)
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (''Comrac Fergusa fri Coin Culaind'' ‘The meeting of Fergus and Cú Chulainn’ (I, II, III))
  • Dinnshenchas Érenn  + (''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning t''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning the prominent places of Ireland’) is the term that is most commonly used to describe a compilation or body of medieval Irish literature in which the origins of particular Irish placenames are explained with reference to certain legendary events.ith reference to certain legendary events.)
  • Dinnshenchas Érenn (phase 2011-2012)  + (''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning t''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning the prominent places of Ireland’) is the term that is most commonly used to describe a compilation or body of medieval Irish literature in which the origins of particular Irish placenames are explained with reference to certain legendary events. During this first phase of the project, every text will be indexed in our database, together with some metadata and bibliographic information. Lists of manuscript witnesses are to be completed at a later date (many entries will simply show you the sigla that E. Gwynn assigned to the MSS and which are explained on [[Dinnshenchas Érenn]]).nshenchas Érenn]]).)
  • Aid:PONK/2012  + (''The Celtic evil eye and related mythological motifs in medieval Ireland'', Studies in the History and Anthropology of Religion 2 (Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2012).)
  • Scéla Cano meic Gartnáin (index)  + ((2) Cano and Marcán mac Tommáin; Créd... Ed. line 172ff (ed. Binchy).)
  • Scéla Cano meic Gartnáin (index)  + ((3a) Cano and Gúaire / Senchán Torpéist; (3b) farewell feast and Créd's sleeping charm. Ed. Binchy, line 216ff.)
  • Scéla Cano meic Gartnáin (index)  + ((4) Illand mac Scandláin. Ed. Binchy, line 324 (''Luid Cano co h-Illand mac Scanláin...'').)
  • Scéla Cano meic Gartnáin (index)  + ((5) Cano, now king, learns of Illand's death and returns to avenge him)
  • Ollam Fótla (var. Fodla)  + ((al. Eochaid), son of Fíachu Fínscothach; legendary high-king of Ireland.)
  • Amairgen mac Eccit (Salaig)  + ((chief) poet of the Ulaid in the Ulster Cycle of tales; son of Eccet Salach)
  • Commentary on Félire Óengusso - 1 November  + (1 November, ed. and tr. Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, <i>[[Stokes 1905a|Martyrology of Oengus]]</i> (1905): 238–239.)
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (13–15. ''Tochostul fear nÉrend'' ‘The muster of the men of Ireland’ (I, II))
  • Commentary on Félire Óengusso - 14 September  + (14 September (Cóemán Brecc), ed. and tr. W14 September (Cóemán Brecc), ed. and tr. Whitley <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Stokes</span>, <i>[[Stokes 1905a|Martyrology of Oengus]]</i> (1905): 206–209, based on MSS ''R<sup>1</sup>'' (Rawl. B 505), ''F'' (Franciscan A 7) and ''L'' (Laud Misc. 610); ed. and tr. James Henthorn <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Todd</span>, <i>[[Todd 1848|Leabhar Breathnach annso sis: the Irish version of the Historia Britonum of Nennius]]</i> (1848): 201–202 note m, based on the ''LB'' (Leabhar Breac) version.848): 201–202 note m, based on the ''LB'' (Leabhar Breac) version.)
  • Lorcán Ó Muireadhaigh/Lawrence Murray manuscripts (Lámhscríbhinní Lorcáin Uí Mhuireadhaigh)  + (14 manuscripts that formerly belonged to L14 manuscripts that formerly belonged to Lawrence P. Murray (d. 1941). Catalogue descriptions are available in: Pádraig <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Fiannachta</span>, <i>[[Walsh et al 1965-1980f|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VI]]</i>, vol. 6 (1969): 108–131.Walsh et al 1965-1980f|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VI]]</i>, vol. 6 (1969): 108–131.)
  • Manuscripts for index: By repository/Monaghan, St Macartan's College  + (2 MSS, both discussed by Séamus P. <spa2 MSS, both discussed by Séamus P. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Mórdha</span>, ‘[[Ó Mórdha (Séamus P.) 1958 celt4ahfo|Irish manuscripts in St. Macarten’s Seminary, Monaghan]]’, <i>Celtica</i> 4 (1958). More MSS are listed by Richard Hayes, whose entries are incorporated into https://sources.nli.ie, but <strong>most of these are now in Maynooth</strong>.</br></br>It appears from ''Duanaire Finn'' vol. 3: 125 that the final MS described by Eoin <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">MacNeill</span>, ‘[[MacNeill (Eoin) 1902 gael12nq|The Rossmore manuscripts]]’, <i>Gaelic Journal</i> 12 (1902), containing a version of ''Agallamh Oisín 7 Phadraig'', was transferred to Macartan's College.ing a version of ''Agallamh Oisín 7 Phadraig'', was transferred to Macartan's College.)
  • Collectanea (Tírechán) (index)  + (3-5. Patrick’s arrival in Ireland, his meeting with Benignus and his first church (Armagh).)
  • Texts for index: Apocrypha in the Irish church IV: Infancy narratives (McNamara, pp. 35-50)  + (36. An Irish Infany Gospel, 42-46. MS LB 136. An Irish Infany Gospel, 42-46. MS LB 133b-139b. Beg. Iacob mac Ioseb gabar na oileamain. Account of birth and upbringing of Mary, Annunciation, etc., until the birth of Christ and murder of Zacharias. Story in the mouth of Mary to Simeon. </br></br>Cf. summary in Gospel of Máel Brígte.n. Cf. summary in Gospel of Máel Brígte.)
  • Réamonn Ó Muireadhaigh manuscripts (Lámhscríbhinní Réamoinn Uí Mhuireadhaigh)  + (4 manuscripts belonging to the poet Réamon4 manuscripts belonging to the poet Réamonn Ó Muireadhaigh. For MS 1, see Pádraig <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Fiannachta</span>, <i>[[Walsh et al 1965-1980g|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VII. Liosta na gcéadlínte]]</i>, vol. 7 (1972): 13–14; for MSS 2-3, see Pádraig <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Fiannachta</span> • P. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Maoileachlainn</span>, <i>[[Walsh et al 1965-1980h|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VIII. Index ginearálta]]</i>, vol. 8 (1973): 203–204; for MS 4, see Réamonn <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ó Muireadhaigh</span>, ‘[[Ó Muireadhaigh (Réamonn) 1974 sean7.2aana|Lámhscríbhinn as Contae an Chláir sa Tuaisceart]]’, <i>Seanchas Ardmhacha</i> 7.2 (1974).2aana|Lámhscríbhinn as Contae an Chláir sa Tuaisceart]]’, <i>Seanchas Ardmhacha</i> 7.2 (1974).)
  • Sebright Gift  + (43 manuscripts donated by Sir John Sebright (d. 1709), many of which can be traced to Edward Lhuyd's tour through Ireland.)
  • lists of texts and manuscripts  + (<div>A generic category for any variety of text that lists texts and/or manuscripts, or perhaps parts of them. Examples are medieval tale-lists, library catalogues and tables of contents in manuscripts.<br></div>)
  • Táin bó Cúailnge - Aided Cáur  + (<em>Aided Cáur</em> ‘The death<em>Aided Cáur</em> ‘The death of Cúr’ (TBC I, II, III), incl. <em>Turim na cless</em> ‘A list of the feats’. Recension I, ed. and tr. Cecile <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Rahilly</span>, <i>[[O'Rahilly 1976|Táin bó Cúailnge: Recension I]]</i> (1976): lines 1694–1736; II, ed. and tr. Cecile <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Rahilly</span>, <i>[[O'Rahilly 1967|Táin bó Cúalnge: from the Book of Leinster]]</i> (1967): lines 1816–1857; III (§§ 20–32). Episode on the death of Cúr.7|Táin bó Cúalnge: from the Book of Leinster]]</i> (1967): lines 1816–1857; III (§§ 20–32). Episode on the death of Cúr.)
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (<em>Aided Etarcomail</em> ‘The death of Etarcomol [and the terms offered by the men of Ireland]’ (I, II, III))
  • Aid:Version alignment/TBC  + (<em>Aided in togmaili 7 in pheta eóin</em> ‘The death of the marten and of the pet bird’ (I, II, III))
  • Táin bó Cúailnge I - 07 Aided na rígamus  + (<em>Aided na rígamus</em> (‘Th<em>Aided na rígamus</em> (‘The death of the royal mercenaries’), recension I only, ed. and tr. Cecile <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Rahilly</span>, <i>[[O'Rahilly 1976|Táin bó Cúailnge: Recension I]]</i> (1976): lines 1685–1693.ahilly 1976|Táin bó Cúailnge: Recension I]]</i> (1976): lines 1685–1693.)
  • Foras feasa ar Éirinn - 0 - Prologue  + (<em>An díonbhrollach</em>: a v<em>An díonbhrollach</em>: a vindicatory introduction in 9 subdivisions (<em>ailt</em>), ed. and tr. David <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Comyn</span>, <i>[[Comyn and Dinneen 1902-1914a|Foras feasa ar Éirinn: The history of Ireland by Geoffrey Keating D. D. Volume I, containing the introduction and first book of the history]]</i>, vol. 1 (1902).[Comyn and Dinneen 1902-1914a|Foras feasa ar Éirinn: The history of Ireland by Geoffrey Keating D. D. Volume I, containing the introduction and first book of the history]]</i>, vol. 1 (1902).)
  • Celtchar (mac Uithechair)  + (<em>Celtcha(i)r mac U(i)thechair</em>, warrior in the Ulster Cycle of tales.)
  • Penance in early medieval Ireland and abroad: penitentials, canon law and related texts  + (<em>Description forthcoming.</em&<em>Description forthcoming.</em> The aim is add key texts relating to penitential practices in early medieval Ireland, Britain and mainland Europe. This subproject benefits from the descriptions written by Elaine Pereira Farrell on the website https://penitentials.wordpress.com, which she started when writing her PhD thesis on “Taboos and penitence: Christian conversion and popular religion in early medieval Ireland”. This thesis was submitted in 2012 (see the bibliography) and is currently being transformed into a book publication to appear with Brepols.formed into a book publication to appear with Brepols.)
  • Aid:PONK/2005  + (<em>Fled Bricrenn</em> and tales of terror.<br/> In: <em>Peritia</em> 19 (2005 [2007]) 173-192.)
  • Aífe ... wife of Muiredach mac Fínnachta  + (<em>folt-fhind</em> ‘of the fair hair’, in <em>Acallam na senórach</em>, wife of Muiredach mac Fínnachta.)
  • Agents for index: Acallam na senórach: A  + (<h4>Ir. <i>Áedán</i></h4> AnS, ed. Stokes (misspellings may occur):)
  • CODECS tutorial: creating dossiers  + (<p>A <strong>dossier</stron<p>A <strong>dossier</strong> is typically a bundle of documents and materials devoted to a particular topic, not infrequently with a special focus on the presentation of evidence of any kind. The CODECS dossier is a module within the website that pursues a similar flexible approach, especially where pages and general search/browse interfaces from other modules (catalogues, bibliographies, etc.) do not offer the right format and scope. For instance, it can be a great way to draw attention to your own research and research questions. <br></p><p>Possible examples are dossiers on literary themes and motifs, or collections of documentary evidence for historical practices. For instance, a topic for a modest-sized dossier could be the development of motifs relating to the c<em>orr-bolg</em> (commonly translated as ‘crane-bag’) in Irish literature, or perhaps a broader collection of associated themes of which the <em>corr-bolg </em>is one. <br></p><p>As the creator and curator of a dossier, you are free to select the types of building blocks appropriate to your topic. In addition to the usual text processing tools, there are options for running data queries, creating maps, embedding text marked up in TEI XML and working with IIIF. Dossiers do not need to be finished products and could just as well be used as working documents that are developed over time. <br></p><p>This tutorial will walk you through some of the possibilities it has to offer. <br></p><p><em>Work in progress! </em><br></p>><p>This tutorial will walk you through some of the possibilities it has to offer. <br></p><p><em>Work in progress! </em><br></p>)
  • Anglo-Irish hand (col. 400.i) (Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1318/10)  + (<p>A Latin note written in Anglo-Iri<p>A Latin note written in Anglo-Irish script and dated to the 15th century occurs at the end of the manuscript (col. 400 <em>inf</em>). It reads <em>Iste liber in se continet centum lxv folia</em>, suggesting that the original numbered 165 leaves.<span id="ref1" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(1)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 1</sup> Hans P. A. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Oskamp</span>, ‘[[Oskamp 1975a|The Yellow Book of Lecan proper]]’, <i>Ériu</i> 26 (1975).</span></span><span id="ref2" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(2)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 2</sup> William <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">O'Sullivan</span>, ‘[[O'Sullivan (William) 1981a|Ciothruadh’s Yellow Book of Lecan]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 18 (1981).</span></span></p>livan (William) 1981a|Ciothruadh’s Yellow Book of Lecan]]’, <i>Éigse</i> 18 (1981).</span></span></p>)
  • fuidir  + (<p>A class of semi‐free, servile tenant in early Irish law.<br></p>)
  • Hand of the scribe (Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 24 P 17/part 2)  + (<p>A colophon states that the MS was<p>A colophon states that the MS was written by Conchobhar Magaodh for <em>Gilla Pádruicc ua Seibhlín</em>. Wh. Stokes, in his edition of<em> In cath catharda</em>, gives the surname of the scribe as <em>Magaodh(ugain)</em>, apparently allowing for the possibility that the full name represents a form of the name Mac Aodhagáin. However, nearly identical forms of the name (normalised: <em>Mág Aodha</em> or Scottish-influenced <em>M. Aoidh</em>), occur in another MS of the same scribe, [[Dublin, National Library of Ireland, MS G 1304]]. <br></p>blin, National Library of Ireland, MS G 1304]]. <br></p>)
  • Midianites  + (<p>A nomadic people in the Old Testa<p>A nomadic people in the Old Testament, who are said to have descended from Midian son of Abraham and inhabited the region of Midian in northwestern Arabia. <em>Numbers</em> 31 tells of a war in which the Israelites attacked and defeated the Midianites, killing all the men and boys.<br></p>feated the Midianites, killing all the men and boys.<br></p>)
  • Scribal hand (Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1394)  + (<p>A note at f. 84v identifies the s<p>A note at f. 84v identifies the scribe as Fearfeasa Ó Duibhgeannáin, who wrote his work ''Tom an Bhruic'' (Tombrick, Co. Wexford).<span id="ref1" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(1)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 1</sup> T. K. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Abbott</span> • E. J. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Gwynn</span>, <i>[[Abbott and Gwynn 1921|Catalogue of Irish MSS in TCD]]</i> (1921).</span></span></p>bott and Gwynn 1921|Catalogue of Irish MSS in TCD]]</i> (1921).</span></span></p>)
  • Hands (unidentified) (Dublin, National Library of Ireland, MS G 45)  + (<p>A number of unidentified hands.&l<p>A number of unidentified hands.<span id="ref1" class="customanchor"></span><span class="smw-highlighter smwttpersist" data-state="persistent" data-maxwidth="400"><sup class="text-dark text-spaced">(1)</sup><span class="smwttcontent"><sup>n. 1</sup> Nessa <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Ní Shéaghdha</span>, <i>[[Ní Shéaghdha 1961a|Catalogue of Irish manuscripts in the National Library of Ireland]]</i> (1961): G 45 </span></span><br></p>Ní Shéaghdha 1961a|Catalogue of Irish manuscripts in the National Library of Ireland]]</i> (1961): G 45 </span></span><br></p>)
  • Lebor gabála Érenn - F 167. Banba and Partholón  + (<p>A passage relating how Banba was <p>A passage relating how Banba was the first to come to Ireland, along with 150 women and three men, and gave her name to Ireland; foll. by a brief passage concerning Partholón. It is edited by Macalister from MS F (fragment in RIA MS 23 E 29) of LGÉ recension A, where it is attributed to <em>Lebor Dromma Snechta</em> (= <em>Cín Dromma Snechtai</em>), a manuscript now lost.<br></p>lt;em>Cín Dromma Snechtai</em>), a manuscript now lost.<br></p>)
  • Dublin, Irish Jesuit Archives  + (<p>A private repository of materials relating to the activities of Irish Jesuits around the world.</p>)