Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 139–148 + (§§ 139–148, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s … §§ 139–148, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): how after the battle of Mag Tuired, Lóch Lethglas is spared and offers Lug detailed reports of the battle and its outcome; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).e Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 14 and 24 + (§§ 14 and 24, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. < … §§ 14 and 24, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the accesssion of Bres; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983), Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, Éigse 18 (1981) and Gerard Murphy, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955).n ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 149–161 + (§§ 149–161, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s … §§ 149–161, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also, Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): how after the battle of Mag Tuired, the defeated king Bres is spared and Lug arranges a deal with him; discussed in William Sayers, ‘[[Sayers 1986a|Bargaining for the life of Bres in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 34 (1987), John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).uired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 15–23 + (§§ 15–23, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 15–23, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the conception and birth of Bres; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983), Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, Éigse 18 (1981) and Gerard Murphy, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955).''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 162–165 + (§§ 162–165, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s … §§ 162–165, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): three miscellaneous anecdotes after the account of the battle of Mag Tuired; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 166–167 + (§§ 166–167, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <s … §§ 166–167, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): conclusion in which the Morrígan utters two ''roscada''; discussed by John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).e Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 1–7 + (§§ 1–7, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the origins of the Tuatha Dé (from Harleian 5280, f. 63r ff); discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982). Regarded as a later addition to the text, e.g. in Gerard Murphy, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955). A longer version of this introduction is found as a separate text, edited in Vernam Hull, ‘[[Hull 1930d|The four jewels of the ''Tuatha Dé Danann'']]’, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 18 (1930), and a recension of the Lebor gabála also includes a version.''Tuatha Dé Danann'']]’, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 18 (1930), and a recension of the Lebor gabála also includes a version.)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 25–32 + (§§ 25–32, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 25–32, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the reign of Bres: tribute and the story of the Dagda, Mac Óc and the satirist Cridenbél; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982). Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 33–35 + (§§ 33–35, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 33–35, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): during Bres’s reign, the story of Núadu, Dían Cecht and the killing of the latter’s son Míach; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).ed'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 36–40 + (§§ 36–40, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 36–40, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the reign of Bres (continued), marks of bad kingship and the decision to depose Bres after seven years of rule; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 41–51 + (§§ 41–51, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 41–51, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): how Bres, following the decision to oust him from the kingship after seven years, seeks the Fomoire, meets his father and requests military support to regain the kingship of Ireland; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).ge Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 52–74 + (§§ 52–74, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 52–74, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the arrival of Lug (Samildánach) at Tara and his attainment of the leadership over the Túatha Dé; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 75–83 + (§§ 75–83, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 75–83, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the secret council convened by the Túatha Dé in preparation for the battle against the Fomoire; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982). Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 84–93 + (§§ 84–93, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <spa … §§ 84–93, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on two of the Dagda’s missions concerning the battle of Mag Tuired, both of which involve him sleeping with a female deity; discussed in Patrick K. Ford, ‘[[Ford (Patrick K.) 1998a|The which on the wall: obscenity exposed in early Ireland]]’ in Obscenity... (1998), John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983), Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).: myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 94–120 + (§§ 94–120, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. <sp … §§ 94–120, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): some events and conversations shortly before the battle of Mag Tuired, especially concerning the special skills and abilities of the Túatha Dé [prelude to §§ 121–126]; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983), Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1982b|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (24-120)]]’, Éigse 19 (1982) and Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1983a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).: myth and structure (84-93, 120-67)]]’, Éigse 19 (1983).)
Mittelirische Verslehren II - §§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112 (10th year) + (§§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112, ed. Rudolf <s … §§ 99-109 and §§ 109-112, ed. Rudolf Thurneysen, ‘[[Thurneysen 1891|Mittelirische Verslehren]]’ in Irische Texte mit Wörterbuch... (1891): 54–59 [https://archive.org/stream/irischetextemite00stok#page/54/mode/2up direct link]. The first series of items (§§ 99-109) lists and illustrates the metrical forms to be mastered by an aspirant fili in his tenth year of study (foglaim). The forms representing this stage of education, perhaps known collectively as set-natha/sed-nadha súad (§ 112; cf. sen-natha, § 99) are thought to have been inserted into the original text when it was first expanded (Thurneysen). It continues with a further section (§§ 110-112), which may represent a later addition to the text.Thurneysen). It continues with a further section (§§ 110-112), which may represent a later addition to the text.)
Cath Maige Tuired - §§ 9–13 + (§§ 9–13, ed. and tr. Elizabeth A. Gray, [[Gray 1982a|Cath Maige Tuired: The second battle of Mag Tuired]] (1982) and also Whitley Stokes, ‘[[Stokes 1891e|The second battle of Moytura]]’, Revue Celtique 12 (1891): on the taking of Ireland from the Fir Bolg; discussed in John Carey, ‘[[Carey 1989a|Myth and mythography in Cath Maige Tuired]]’, Studia Celtica 24-25 (1989–1990), Tomás Ó Cathasaigh, ‘[[Ó Cathasaigh 1983b|''Cath Maige Tuired'' as exemplary myth]]’ in Folia Gadelica... (1983), Elizabeth A. Gray, ‘[[Gray 1981a|''Cath Maige Tuired'': myth and structure (1-24)]]’, Éigse 18 (1981) and Gerard Murphy, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955). Like §§ 1–7, this section is often regarded as an interpolation based on Lebor gabála Érenn (see e.g. Gerard Murphy, ‘[[Murphy 1953-1955|Notes on ''Cath Maige Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955)).Tuired'']]’, Éigse 7 (1953–1955)).)
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 486/ff. 23-75 + (Ó Cuív suggests that the entire manuscript … Ó Cuív suggests that the entire manuscript (all sections) may have belonged to the Ó Conmhaigh family in Co. Tipperary before James Ware obtained it as a gift. A marginal note on f. 22vb states that the book was written for Mathun Ó Connmhaigh at Cluain Plocáin (Co. Roscommon), a place known as the seat of Ó Maoil Chonaire family. While it is suggested that “the value of this marginal note may be questioned”, Ware’s note on f. 53v (see below) indicates that the manuscript had been with the Ó Connmhaigh family.ipt had been with the Ó Connmhaigh family.)
Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1378 + (Ó Dálaigh’s copy of a portion of this MS i … Ó Dálaigh’s copy of a portion of this MS in TCD 1291 has a note referring to its source as leabhar ui Suildubhain, “The book of Ó Súilleabháin”. Abbott infers from this that the manuscript belonged to F. S. Sullivan, the lawyer who is known for having commissioned other transcripts by Ó Dálaigh.or having commissioned other transcripts by Ó Dálaigh.)
Llên Cymru + (“Founded in 1950 as a Welsh-language journ … “Founded in 1950 as a Welsh-language journal, Llên Cymru’s editorial purpose is to publish the highest quality academic research on Welsh literature of any period, and welcomes research in the form of both scholarly and opinion-based articles. Having edited the journal from volume 20 to volume 35, Professor Gruffydd Aled Williams transferred editorship in 2013 to Dr Dylan Foster Evans, Dr E. Wyn James and Dr Siwan Rosser, all of the School of Welsh at Cardiff University. The journal, published annually, includes full-length articles, a notes section for short contributions, and book reviews. Typically, articles can incorporate research on early Welsh poetry, twentieth-century Welsh literature and traditional Welsh folk tales” (source: UWP).ature and traditional Welsh folk tales” (source: UWP).)
Liverpool University Library Manuscripts + (“Individual manuscript items and autograph … “Individual manuscript items and autograph letters collected according to the research interests of former members of the University, or found within the University Library. The Liverpool University Library Manuscript sequence includes diaries, commonplace books, letters and notebooks” (https://sca-archives.liverpool.ac.uk/Collection/64109). This collection includes items in Welsh or of Welsh interest.ludes items in Welsh or of Welsh interest.)
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 514 + (“It is reasonable to assume that the manus … “It is reasonable to assume that the manuscript belonged originally to Maghnus Ó Domhnaill who died in 1563” (Ó Cuív: 262). Note, however, that Caoimhín Breatnach (2007) has argued that the present copy is unlikely to have been the one produced for Ó Domhnaill.ave been the one produced for Ó Domhnaill.)
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 514 + (“Later owners named are Mac Suibhne of Bag … “Later owners named are Mac Suibhne of Baghaine (f. iiir of Part I), and ‘Donnogh mc Swyn’ and ‘Henry Swyne’ (f. [19]r of Part II).”(2)n. 2 Brian Ó Cuív, [[Ó Cuív 2001|Catalogue of Irish MSS in the Bodleian]] (2001): 262. The evidence seems to point to some connection with the Clann Suibhne, particular that of Tír Boghaine (bar. Banagh, Co Donegal).oint to some connection with the Clann Suibhne, particular that of Tír Boghaine (bar. Banagh, Co Donegal).)
Saint-Omer, Bibliothèque municipale, MS 342 bis/fol. B + (“Written in Ireland or Wales” (Lowe 1953); … “Written in Ireland or Wales” (Lowe 1953); written in “keltische - irische oder britische - Schrift” (Bischoff); Brown (1982) cites it as an example of a hybrid Irish script reminiscent of MSS from Northumbria and Echternach; Parkes (1992): “Copied in Ireland s.vii ex”; Ganz (2015): “no doubt copied in Ireland”. While earlier commentators have expressed uncertainty about the language of the glosses,(3)n. 3 Bischoff: “Einige keltische Glossen sind noch auf den Sprachcharakter ob irisch oder britisch, zu prüfen” scholars such as Ó Cróinín (2001) have identified them as Old Irish;(4)n. 4 “The language [...] makes clear that the glosses are Old Irish; the horizontal dashes, that they are early”. he suggests that they “would all pass comfortably in the seventh century; lóg, for example, shows the undiphthongised form of the word that is later spelt lúag / lúach”.ts that they “would all pass comfortably in the seventh century; lóg, for example, shows the undiphthongised form of the word that is later spelt lúag / lúach”.)
Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, MS lat. qu. 690/III + (“vermutlich Mainz” (Fingernagel).(5)n. 5 Andreas Fingernagel, [[Fingernagel (Andreas) 1991a|Die illuminierten lateinischen Handschriften deutscher Provenienz der Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin: 8.-12.Jahrhundert]] (1991): 88.. Bischoff suggests that the dominant hands are of Mainz, while two are Insular or Anglo-Saxon and others point to the area of Reims and Saint-Armand.(6)n. 6 “unter diesen dominieren die Mainzer, andere weisen etwa auf die Gegend von Reims oder Saint-Armand, zwei schreiben insular, wohl angelsächsisch.” Cf. his ''Katalog''. The explanation he offers is that a likely scriptorium for such a mix of scripts to come together would be Mainz. Bischoff also suggests a connection to the Irish scholar Probus.(7)n. 7 ''Katalog'': “Warscheinlich im Mainz zusammengeschrieben (vermutlich im Kreise des Iren Probus, gest. 859)” text-spaced">(7)n. 7 ''Katalog'': “Warscheinlich im Mainz zusammengeschrieben (vermutlich im Kreise des Iren Probus, gest. 859)” )

Delw y byd - Chapters 1[1] – 7[7]: Structure of the World + (Discusses the structure of the world in general. Note: the Welsh text omits chapter 4[4].)

Aid:Version alignment/Tochmarc Emire + ('''LU''', in the diplomatic ed. The text of pp. 121a-122 was written by ''M'', that of pp. 123-124 (intercalated leaf), some four leaves now lost, 125–126 and 127a-b (on top of an erasure) written by reviser ''H''.)
Texts for index: Welsh literature (vernacular), mostly religious prose + ('''Welsh versions of the Transitus Beatae … '''Welsh versions of the Transitus Beatae Mariae'''Three Welsh versions of the apocryphal ''Transitus Beatae Mariae'' (texts on the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin), al. ''Esgyniad Meir i'r nef'' (lit. The ascent of May into heaven) or ''Y Modd ydd aeth Mair i nef'' (How Mary Mary went into Heaven), although some of these Welsh titles may be preserved for a single version only. Three versions are distinguished by J. E. Caerwyn Williams (BBCS 18), whom I have not read. I (DG) currently don't have the sources to hand to know if the adaptations are interdependent or derive from a common vernacular original, although my impression from other references is that they are independent works. There should then be a page to each version. The Welsh title ''Marwolaeth Mair'' is also attested.Note: Gruffudd ap Maredudd, prince of Deheubarth, commissioned one of the Welsh versions.;Latin sourcesThe versions may not even be based on the same Latin originals. One Latin ''Transitus'' is that by Melito of Sardes. Tischendorf, ''Apocalypses Apocyphae'' (Lepizig 1866).;Manuscripts:* Group A? - [[Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Llanstephan MS 27]] (c.1400), beginning and ending missing. Scribe: Hywel Fychan.* Group B? - [[Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Llanstephan MS 117]] (c.1550?), 136—141* [[Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Peniarth MS 5]] (''Llyfr Gwyn Rhydderch'')* [[Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Peniarth MS 14]] (c. 1250)* [[Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Peniarth MS 182]] (c. 1514) - Group ?* [[Oxford, Jesus College, MS 119]] (c. 1346); * Later MSS. See BBCS 18.131–132.;Editions* [[Williams (J. E. Caerwyn) 1958-1960 bbcs18oq]]* [[Morris-Jones and Rhŷs 1894 afh]]: 77–85.;Studies* Williams * [[Evans (D. Simon) 1986a]], 70–71* Williams (J. E. Caerwyn) 1966 ulpkic , 79-80* Caerwyn Williams 1958a , 312-359, 360-408* Ingo Mittendorf has a brief article in ''Celtic culture'', p. 1685.ef article in ''Celtic culture'', p. 1685.)
Dinnshenchas Érenn (phase 2011-2012) + (''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning t … ''Dinnshenchas Érenn'' (‘Lore concerning the prominent places of Ireland’) is the term that is most commonly used to describe a compilation or body of medieval Irish literature in which the origins of particular Irish placenames are explained with reference to certain legendary events. During this first phase of the project, every text will be indexed in our database, together with some metadata and bibliographic information. Lists of manuscript witnesses are to be completed at a later date (many entries will simply show you the sigla that E. Gwynn assigned to the MSS and which are explained on [[Dinnshenchas Érenn]]).nshenchas Érenn]]).)
Add or improve five key texts concerning the origin legend of the Fothairt (small-scale project) + ((a) rosc beg. A Eochaid Airtt Fu … (a) rosc beg. A Eochaid Airtt Fuath arafalnather iath aneoil; (b) poem beg. Feidlimid athair Echach; (c) poem beg. Fothairt for clannaib Concorb; (d) Genealogical tract on the Fothairt; (d) prose text On the settlement of the Fotharta and the Laigsi; (e) Dinnshenchas of Ráith Chrinna.ent of the Fotharta and the Laigsi; (e) Dinnshenchas of Ráith Chrinna.)
Jones (Robert Isaac) + ((bardic name Alltud Eifion), Welsh pharmacist and printer)
Hand c (secondary, O'Conor) (Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 24 P 33) + ((c) “Charles O'Conor of Belanagare has added some quatrains and his signature, another note written by him occurs at p. 204, and annotations at pp. 112, 121.”)
Commentary on Félire Óengusso - 14 September + (14 September (Cóemán Brecc), ed. and tr. W … 14 September (Cóemán Brecc), ed. and tr. Whitley Stokes, [[Stokes 1905a|Martyrology of Oengus]] (1905): 206–209, based on MSS ''R1'' (Rawl. B 505), ''F'' (Franciscan A 7) and ''L'' (Laud Misc. 610); ed. and tr. James Henthorn Todd, [[Todd 1848|Leabhar Breathnach annso sis: the Irish version of the Historia Britonum of Nennius]] (1848): 201–202 note m, based on the ''LB'' (Leabhar Breac) version.848): 201–202 note m, based on the ''LB'' (Leabhar Breac) version.)
Lorcán Ó Muireadhaigh/Lawrence Murray manuscripts (Lámhscríbhinní Lorcáin Uí Mhuireadhaigh) + (14 manuscripts that formerly belonged to L … 14 manuscripts that formerly belonged to Lawrence P. Murray (d. 1941). Catalogue descriptions are available in: Pádraig Ó Fiannachta, [[Walsh et al 1965-1980f|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VI]], vol. 6 (1969): 108–131.Walsh et al 1965-1980f|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VI]], vol. 6 (1969): 108–131.)
Réamonn Ó Muireadhaigh manuscripts (Lámhscríbhinní Réamoinn Uí Mhuireadhaigh) + (4 manuscripts belonging to the poet Réamon … 4 manuscripts belonging to the poet Réamonn Ó Muireadhaigh. For MS 1, see Pádraig Ó Fiannachta, [[Walsh et al 1965-1980g|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VII. Liosta na gcéadlínte]], vol. 7 (1972): 13–14; for MSS 2-3, see Pádraig Ó Fiannachta • P. Ó Maoileachlainn, [[Walsh et al 1965-1980h|Lámhscríbhinní Gaeilge, Choláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad: clár: Fascúl VIII. Index ginearálta]], vol. 8 (1973): 203–204; for MS 4, see Réamonn Ó Muireadhaigh, ‘[[Ó Muireadhaigh (Réamonn) 1974 sean7.2aana|Lámhscríbhinn as Contae an Chláir sa Tuaisceart]]’, Seanchas Ardmhacha 7.2 (1974).2aana|Lámhscríbhinn as Contae an Chláir sa Tuaisceart]]’, Seanchas Ardmhacha 7.2 (1974).)
Texts for index: Apocrypha in the Irish church IV: Infancy narratives (McNamara, pp. 35-50) + (8th/9th c?., composite text comprising both; ch. 1-17 based on Prot. of James, 18-24 sep. maybe local traditions about Flight into Egypt, local trad?; ch. 25-42 = Thomas.)
lists of texts and manuscripts + (<div>A generic category for any variety of text that lists texts and/or manuscripts, or perhaps parts of them. Examples are medieval tale-lists, library catalogues and tables of contents in manuscripts. </div>)
Example of a map + (<div>This is an example of a map tha … <div>This is an example of a map that focuses on a relatively small area, the hill of Tara. It uses a manually edited GeoJson layer that indicates some of the monuments together with the names which the Petrie and the Ordnance Survey assigned to them. This is combined with queries for hills, 'stretches of land' (plains, etc.) in the surrounding area within 100 km from Tara. </div><div> </div><div>Note that there is a slight glitch, which only happens when the zoom level is higher than 12. A slight movement of the map seems to be necessary to make the markers appear. </div>ght movement of the map seems to be necessary to make the markers appear. </div>)
verse + (<div>Verse is here understood in its … <div>Verse is here understood in its most neutral, formal sense as being applicable to compositions that are characterised by features that set if off from prose, notably having a metrical structure and/or rhyme. This definition does not pay attention to any qualifications, aesthetic or otherwise, that may be used to distinguish poetry from more pedestrian kinds of verse. </div> from more pedestrian kinds of verse. </div>)
Foras feasa ar Éirinn - 0 - Prologue + (An díonbhrollach: a v … An díonbhrollach: a vindicatory introduction in 9 subdivisions (ailt), ed. and tr. David Comyn, [[Comyn and Dinneen 1902-1914a|Foras feasa ar Éirinn: The history of Ireland by Geoffrey Keating D. D. Volume I, containing the introduction and first book of the history]], vol. 1 (1902).[Comyn and Dinneen 1902-1914a|Foras feasa ar Éirinn: The history of Ireland by Geoffrey Keating D. D. Volume I, containing the introduction and first book of the history]], vol. 1 (1902).)
Guide:Image configuration + (Geiriadur, University of Wales Centre for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies. [[commons:File:University of Wales Centre for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies 05.JPG|Source]].)
Aid:PONK/2005 + (Cáin lánamna “The regul … Cáin lánamna “The regulation of couples”. Text and translation of the early Irish law-tract on marriage and sexual relationships. electronisch gepubliceerd als: [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/keltisch/CL-text.htm http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/keltisch/CL-text.htm] [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/keltisch/CL-translation.htm http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/keltisch/CL-translation.htm]translation.htm http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/keltisch/CL-translation.htm])
Hand of note (col. 33) (Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1298/1-238) + ( Additions include a note by Seán mac Torna in col. 33. )
Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion + ((Welsh: Anrhydeddus Gymdeithas y Cymmrodorion), a learned society founded in 1751 by a group of Welshmen in London and re-formed in 1820 and 1873. )
Durham, Cathedral Library + (al. Durham Dean and Chapter Library, library of Durham Cathedral. )
Selecting publications for inclusion + (@todoYou may w … @todoYou may well have noticed that many pages, and different kinds of pages, have a section at the bottom headed '''Sources'''. You may find subsections within them headed '''Primary sources''' and/or '''Secondary sources''' that include select lists of bibliographic references, sometimes with annotations of their own to shed some light on their particular relevance to the subject. Here is how those sections are created and managed. Note that a publication can be added only if it has an associated bibliographic record from which we can retrieve a formatted reference. [...] phic record from which we can retrieve a formatted reference. [...] )
CODECS tutorial: creating dossiers + (A dossier</stron … A dossier is typically a bundle of documents and materials devoted to a particular topic, not infrequently with a special focus on the presentation of evidence of any kind. The CODECS dossier is a module within the website that pursues a similar flexible approach, especially where pages and general search/browse interfaces from other modules (catalogues, bibliographies, etc.) do not offer the right format and scope. For instance, it can be a great way to draw attention to your own research and research questions. Possible examples are dossiers on literary themes and motifs, or collections of documentary evidence for historical practices. For instance, a topic for a modest-sized dossier could be the development of motifs relating to the corr-bolg (commonly translated as ‘crane-bag’) in Irish literature, or perhaps a broader collection of associated themes of which the corr-bolg is one. As the creator and curator of a dossier, you are free to select the types of building blocks appropriate to your topic. In addition to the usual text processing tools, there are options for running data queries, creating maps, embedding text marked up in TEI XML and working with IIIF. Dossiers do not need to be finished products and could just as well be used as working documents that are developed over time. This tutorial will walk you through some of the possibilities it has to offer. Work in progress! >This tutorial will walk you through some of the possibilities it has to offer. Work in progress! )
Anglo-Irish hand (col. 400.i) (Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1318/10) + (A Latin note written in Anglo-Iri … A Latin note written in Anglo-Irish script and dated to the 15th century occurs at the end of the manuscript (col. 400 inf). It reads Iste liber in se continet centum lxv folia, suggesting that the original numbered 165 leaves.(1)n. 1 Hans P. A. Oskamp, ‘[[Oskamp 1975a|The Yellow Book of Lecan proper]]’, Ériu 26 (1975).(2)n. 2 William O'Sullivan, ‘[[O'Sullivan (William) 1981a|Ciothruadh’s Yellow Book of Lecan]]’, Éigse 18 (1981).livan (William) 1981a|Ciothruadh’s Yellow Book of Lecan]]’, Éigse 18 (1981).)
Ortus medicinae (Jan Baptist van Helmont) - On Butler the Irish healer + (A brief passage of Irish interest … A brief passage of Irish interest is the chapter about an Irish healer called Butler (Hybernus quidam Butler nomine) whom Van Helmont met in a prison in Vilvoorde. Butler claimed to have cured many of the plague back in London and was witnessed healing a fellow prisoner of erysipelas through a toad amulet. ellow prisoner of erysipelas through a toad amulet. )
Hand (William Jordan) (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 219) + (A colophon at the end of the manu … A colophon at the end of the manuscript credits William Jordan with completing the text on 12 August, 1611: Here endeth the Creacon of the worlde wth Noyes flude wryten by William Jordan: the XIIth of August 1611. Earlier views that William Jordan was also the author of the play have been rejected in modern times (e.g. Murdoch).uthor of the play have been rejected in modern times (e.g. Murdoch).)
Plas Bodorgan (Bodorgan Hall) + (A country house, seat of the Meyrick (Meyricke) family and home to a Welsh legal manuscript of the Cyfnerth redaction, which is being held in private ownership. )