Bibliography
Inscriptions: general, various
Results (299)
Okasha, Elisabeth, “The non-Ogam inscriptions of Pictland”, Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 9 (Summer, 1985): 43–69.
Stevenson, R. B. K., “Notes on the sculptures at Fahan Mura and Carndonagh, County Donegal”, Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, 115 (1985): 92–95.
Duval, Paul-Marie (ed.), Recueil des inscriptions gauloises, 4 vols, Suppléments à 'Gallia', 55, Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1985.
Edwards, Nancy, “The origins of the free-standing stone cross in Ireland: imitation or innovation?”, Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 32 (1985): 393–410.
Lejeune, Michel, Recueil des inscriptions gauloises, ed. Paul-Marie Duval, fasc. 1: Textes gallo-grecs, Suppléments à 'Gallia', 55, Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1985.
Campanile, Enrico, and Cesare Letta, “A Celtic ghost-word in a Latin inscription from Britain”, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 40 (1984): 55–63.
Henry, Patrick L., “Interpreting the Gaulish inscription of Chamalières”, Études Celtiques 21 (1984): 141–150.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 21, 1984: <link>
abstract:
L’auteur de la tablette gauloise de Chamalières semble avoir fait une offrande au dieu de la fontaine. Le verbe uediiumi, comparé à irl. fíad «respect ; présence », signifie «rendre un culte ». L’auteur de la tablette utilise les charmes des femmes (brixtia anderon : avec gén. pl. de andera «jeune femme »). Il se désigne comme adgarios «invocateur ». Il invoque Maponos pour garantir un serment (serment : toncnaman, luge, luxe) et entraîne avec lui plusieurs personnages nommés, et le groupe des Segouii. Le contenu du serment n’est pas donné, mais la deuxième partie de la tablette décrit les effets attendus de l’intervention divine.
Lacey, Brian [et al.], Archaeological survey of County Donegal: a description of the field antiquities of the county from the Mesolithic Period to the 17th century, Lifford: Donegal County Council, 1983.
Fleuriot, Léon, “À propos de deux inscriptions gauloises, formes verbales celtiques”, Études Celtiques 18 (1981): 89–108.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 18, 1981: <link>
Fleuriot, Léon, “La tablette de Chamalières. Nouveaux commentaires”, Études Celtiques 17 (1980): 145–159.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 17, 1980: <link>
Duval, Paul-Marie, “Varia: La préparation du Recueil des inscriptions gauloises, par Paul-Marie Duval”, Études Celtiques 17 (1980): 278–280.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 17, 1980: <link>
Fleuriot, Léon, “Inscriptions gauloises sur céramique et l'exemple d'une inscription de La Graufesenque et d'une autre de Lezoux”, Études Celtiques 17 (1980): 111–144.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 17, 1980: <link>
Fulford, Michael, and Bruce Selwood, “The Silchester ogham stone: a re-consideration”, Antiquity 54:211 (July, 1980): 95–99.
abstract:
A recent re-examination of the architectural and other sculpted stone fragments from Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum) drew attention to the small sandstone column on which is scored an ogham inscription. The commonest materials used for columns, capitals and ornamental sculpture at Silchester are the fine Jurassic limestones of Bath or Portland type. A very few pieces are carved intertiary sandstones or imported marble. This is the pattern for architectural masonry throughout southern England in the Roman period; limestone predominates and sandstone, usually greensand, is rare. On visual examination the particular stone with the ogham appears to be different from that of the other architectural fragments in the Silchester collection. It should also be noted that no similar material has so far been identified in the city wall or amongst any of the other ordinary building materials recovered from the Roman town. On the basis of visual examination alone it has been suggested that the stone originated from the calcareous grit of the Oxfordshire Corallian (Boon 1959, 87), but doubts about this identification led us to a more searching investigation to ascertain the character and source of the stone. Before introducing these analyses and their results it will be useful to summarize our present knowledge of the Silchester ogham. In this way the implications of the new results can be more satisfactorily appreciated.
Fleuriot, Léon, “L’inscription gauloise de Thiaucourt et le problème des désinences verbales en -seti et en -setu du celtique antique”, Études Celtiques 16 (1979): 123–134.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 16, 1979: <link>
Fleuriot, Léon, “Note additionnelle sur l’inscription de Chamalières”, Études Celtiques 16 (1979): 135–139.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 16, 1979: <link>
Lambert, Pierre-Yves, “La tablette gauloise de Chamalières”, Études Celtiques 16 (1979): 141–196.
Journal volume: Persée – Études Celtiques, vol. 16, 1979: <link>
Harbison, Peter, “The inscriptions on the Cross of the Scriptures at Clonmacnois, County Offaly”, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 79 C (1979): 177–188.
Watkins, Calvert, “Observations on the ‘Nestor’s cup’ inscription”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 80 (1976): 25–40.
Lejeune, Michel, “Quel celtiquo dans ΔEΔEBPATOYΔEKANTEM”, in: Anna Morpurgo Davies, and Wolfgang Meid (eds), Studies in Greek, Italic, and Indo-European linguistics: offered to Leonard R. Palmer on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, June 5, 1976, 16, Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Innsbruck, 1976. 139–151.
Tovar, Antonio, “Ein neues Denkmal der keltiberischen Sprache: die Bronze von Botorrita”, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 34 (1975): 1–19.
Szemerényi, Oswald, “A Gaulish dedicatory formula”, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 88:2 (1974): 246–286.
Raftery, Barry, “A late ogham inscription from Co. Tipperary”, The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 99 (1969): 161–164.
Wright, R. P., and Kenneth H. Jackson, “A late inscription from Wroxeter”, The Antiquaries Journal 48:2 (September, 1968): 296–300.
abstract:
The inscribed stone which is the subject of this article was found in the early spring of 1967 in ploughing just inside the defences of the Roman town at Wroxeter (Viroconium), just west of the ‘Eastern Cemetery’ marked on the V.C.H. plan. As the stone is heavy it is unlikely to have been dragged any distance by the plough. It may be suggested that at a late date interments had spread inside the once-inhabited area. The latest levels at Roman Wroxeter have been totally removed or extensively disturbed by persistent ploughing. Dr. G. Webster can cite no artefacts which can be placed in the fifth century, but chance discoveries may help to fill this lacuna. Precise dating cannot be attained, but it seems possible that Cunorix as an Irish foederatus could have settled at Wroxeter in a decade early in the fifth century, though it should be emphasized that the only firm date we have is c. A.D. 460–75 when the stone was set up, as Professor Jackson estimates on linguistic grounds.
Henry, Françoise, Irish art in the Early Christian period (to A.D. 800), 3rd ed., London: Methuen, 1965.
Mac White, Eóin, “Contributions to a study of ogam memorial stones”, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 28 (1960–1961): 294–308.
Grosjean, Paul, “Notes d’hagiographie celtique, no. 46: Les inscriptions métriques de l’église de Péronne”, Analecta Bollandiana 78 (1960): 369.
Jackson, Kenneth H., Language and history in early Britain: a chronological survey of the Brittonic languages 1st to 12th c. A.D., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1953.
Gray, Louis H., “Notules étymologiques sur des inscriptions gauloises”, Études Celtiques 6:1 (1952–1954): 62–70.
Jackson, Kenneth H., “Notes on the Ogam inscriptions of southern Britain”, in: Cyril Fox, and Bruce Dickins (eds), The early cultures of north-west Europe: H. M. Chadwick memorial studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950. 197–214.
Nash-Williams, V. E., The early Christian monuments of Wales, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1950.
Conspectus of Christian monuments in Wales (5th-13th centuries), including stones inscribed in Latin and Ogham Irish, and decorated crosses.
Macalister, R. A. S., Corpus inscriptionum Insularum Celticarum [CIIC], 2 vols, vol. 2, Dublin: Stationery Office, 1949.
Irishmanuscripts.ie – PDF: <link>
Macalister, R. A. S., Corpus inscriptionum Insularum Celticarum [CIIC], 2 vols, vol. 1, Dublin: Stationery Office, 1945.
Irishmanuscripts.ie – PDF: <link>
Introduction; The Ogham and analogous inscriptions of Ireland [Province of Connaught; Leinster; Munster; Ulster]; The Ogham and analogous inscriptions of Wales, England, The Isle of Man Scotland; Index locorum; Index verborum.
Macalister, R. A. S., “The inscriptions and language of the Picts”, in: John Ryan (ed.), Féil-sgríbhinn Eóin Mhic Néill: Essays and studies presented to professor Eoin MacNeill on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, May 15th 1938, Dublin: Three Candles, 1940. 184–226.
Carcopino, Jérôme, “Une cohorte gauloise au Maroc”, Revue Celtique 51 (1934): 32–33.
Journal volume: Gallica: <link>
Macalister, R. A. S., “The inscriptions on the slab at Fahan Mura, Co. Donegal”, The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 59 (1929): 89–98.
RCAHMW (ed.), An inventory of the ancient monuments in Wales and Monmouthshire, 7 vols, vol. 7: County of Pembroke, London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1925.
Plummer, Charles, “On the meaning of ogam stones”, Revue Celtique 40 (1923): 387–390.
Journal volume: Internet Archive: <link>
Armstrong, E. C. R., and R. A. S. Macalister, “Wooden book with leaves indented and waxed found near Springmount Bog, Co. Antrim”, Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 50 (1920): 160–166.
Macalister, R. A. S., “Notes on some Ogham inscriptions, including two recently discovered”, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 34 C (1919): 400–404.
Internet Archive – offprint: <link>
