No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "|TagLanguageSubject= |" to "|") |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Reference | {{Reference | ||
|Publication type=Journal article | |||
|Surname1=Matasović | |Surname1=Matasović | ||
|Given1=Ranko | |Given1=Ranko | ||
|Contribution=The substratum in Insular Celtic | |Contribution=The substratum in Insular Celtic | ||
|Periodical=Journal of Language Relationship | |Periodical=Journal of Language Relationship | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Online archive= | |Online archive= | ||
|Abstract2=The discussion focuses on the problem of pre-Celtic substratum languages in the British Islands. The article by R. Matasović begins by dealing with the syntactic features of Insular Celtic languages (Brittonic and Goidelic): the author analyses numerous innovations in Insular Celtic and finds certain parallels in languages of the Afro-Asiatic macrofamily. The second part of his paper contains the analysis of that particular part of the Celtic lexicon which cannot be attributed to the PIE layer. A number of words for which only a substratum origin can be assumed is attested only in Brittonic and Goidelic. The author proposes to reconstruct Proto-Insular Celtic forms for this section of the vocabulary. This idea encounters objections from T. Mikhailova, who prefers to qualify common non-Celtic lexicon of Goidelic and Brittonic as parallel loanwords from the same substratum language. The genetic value of this language, however, remains enigmatic for both authors. | |Abstract2=The discussion focuses on the problem of pre-Celtic substratum languages in the British Islands. The article by R. Matasović begins by dealing with the syntactic features of Insular Celtic languages (Brittonic and Goidelic): the author analyses numerous innovations in Insular Celtic and finds certain parallels in languages of the Afro-Asiatic macrofamily. The second part of his paper contains the analysis of that particular part of the Celtic lexicon which cannot be attributed to the PIE layer. A number of words for which only a substratum origin can be assumed is attested only in Brittonic and Goidelic. The author proposes to reconstruct Proto-Insular Celtic forms for this section of the vocabulary. This idea encounters objections from T. Mikhailova, who prefers to qualify common non-Celtic lexicon of Goidelic and Brittonic as parallel loanwords from the same substratum language. The genetic value of this language, however, remains enigmatic for both authors. | ||
| | |TagLanguage= | ||
|SelectSubject= | |||
|LanguageOther= | |LanguageOther= | ||
|SubjectHeadings=Goidelic languages;Brittonic languages | |||
|Discipline=Subject:historical and comparative linguistics | |||
|Subjects= | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:03, 27 October 2020
Matasović, Ranko, “The substratum in Insular Celtic”, Journal of Language Relationship 8 (2012): 153–159, 165–168 (response to Tatyana Mikhailova).
- journal article
- http://www.jolr.ru/article.php?id=100
page url: https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/Matasovi%C4%87_2012b
redirect: https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/Special:Redirect/page/21979
numerical alternative: https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/index.php?curid=21979
page ID: 21979
page ID tracker: https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/index.php?title=Show:ID&id=21979